<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Difference a Day Makes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjw321.wordpress.com/2009/03/07/the-difference-a-day-makes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjw321.wordpress.com/2009/03/07/the-difference-a-day-makes/</link>
	<description>Just another Rhetoric grad student weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:28:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Goowlywaymn</title>
		<link>http://mjw321.wordpress.com/2009/03/07/the-difference-a-day-makes/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Goowlywaymn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjw321.wordpress.com/?p=140#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Amazing, I didn&#039;t heard about that up to now. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing, I didn&#8217;t heard about that up to now. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Faris</title>
		<link>http://mjw321.wordpress.com/2009/03/07/the-difference-a-day-makes/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Faris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjw321.wordpress.com/?p=140#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Well, I disagree with Jessica. It&#039;s still blogging. It just lacks periodicity.

Warner&#039;s point that perhaps the requirement of periodicity for publics is waning because of the internet is an interesting one, and I think your topic sounds amazing.

I don&#039;t really have anything to add, except to question &quot;higher periodicity.&quot; I&#039;m not sure, based on the definitions you give, if something can be more or less periodic than something else. Either it&#039;s regular or it&#039;s not. Seems like periodicity is one of those not-relative nouns, like uniqueness, not a relative one, like warmth.

Looks like you had a great discussion! cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I disagree with Jessica. It&#8217;s still blogging. It just lacks periodicity.</p>
<p>Warner&#8217;s point that perhaps the requirement of periodicity for publics is waning because of the internet is an interesting one, and I think your topic sounds amazing.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really have anything to add, except to question &#8220;higher periodicity.&#8221; I&#8217;m not sure, based on the definitions you give, if something can be more or less periodic than something else. Either it&#8217;s regular or it&#8217;s not. Seems like periodicity is one of those not-relative nouns, like uniqueness, not a relative one, like warmth.</p>
<p>Looks like you had a great discussion! cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
